Thursday, May 21, 2015

Ding!

I had a major light bulb moment yesterday.

For years I had been aware of the seemingly unique problem I had with introducing technology to our staff. There was not necessarily a reluctance but more of a ‘why should I bother’ attitude. They seemed tired of continual change of the advancement of pedagogical twists and turns and how this was reflected in teaching and learning. We tried improving our literacy results by introducing a rigorous planning tool which was, on the whole, not used successfully. It was as though teachers would use it, document their curriculum and then proceeded to do their own thing. The transition to a 1:1 netbook is equally being met with a similar passive resistance. The school mandates the purchase but teachers are not using them in the classroom. It’s easier to use the textbook. One senior teacher remarked to me that there was no use using them in year 11 and 12 because of the written exam.

Probably all this is not new. I imagine schools all over the world are wrestling with similar issues. My problem is that I didn’t see the wood for the trees. I’m like that frog in the tub that’s gradually heating up and can’t escape until it’s too late. It took a new person who has just come into the school to give me some fresh eyes. The issue is that our school is made up of 57 different language groups and the predominant cohort is Asian, that’s not the issue. The major awakening I had is that our student body can be generally described as compliant. Sure, we have our difficulties but generally we don’t get boo out of the kids. I have witnessed this first hand. In some of my courses where students need a step by step (scaffolded) approach to learning, such as a piece of complex software where I put them through a series of videos I have made specifically for the project. These are interspersed with structured activities. When the students are engaged with these, honestly, you can hear a pin drop. It’s spooky. But is this good learning? No, I don’t think so. It’s the ultimate technological sage-on-the-stage.

So, what have been the results of teaching compliant students school wide? Well, for one thing teachers are not challenged to change the way they teach. For them the easy way is to work  through the textbook and assess on that learning. Good old traditional teaching. Never fails, and  students don’t seem to mind.

We are not disparaging. We have a plan. We aim to get our student body motivated to speak up through workshops, surveys and face to face discussions about how we can improve their learning experiences. We will keep putting research and pedagogical argument in front of the staff and push for change not once or twice but constantly. I’m not going to win this, we are.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Digging Into Data

I want to share some data digging I have done recently.
I was interested to see the inquiry our English domain had done on their year 12 exams. Basically, they looked at all the verbs used to introduce short answer questions such as ‘explain’, ‘describe’, ‘analyse’ and so forth. They then did a lesson on all those words to help their students better understand the requirements of the final exam.


I thought it was a good idea so I went through all the IT Application exams from 2007 - 2014 and made a list of all the instructional verbs. You can see the raw data by clicking the link below.


Here’s a list of the words and the number of times they occur. It’s easy to see the most popular words but keep in mind the chart represents words used inclusively over the last seven years. The picture changes when we focus on the list for the last two years.


                   


‘Explain’ and ‘recommend’ still lead the way but the list is noticeably shorter.


I then decided to match the verbs against Bloom's Taxonomy and chart it. This is what it looks lor the years 2007 and 2008. Note the missing analysing section.




And now compare it with 2013 - 2014

So what do I learn from this? It looks like there is a swing away from lower order thinking (remembering, understanding and applying) to more of an emphasis on analysing, evaluating and, to some extent, creating. This will help me direct my teaching. I can now help my student better understand the exam requirements and also focus in on their skills of expressing their higher order thinking.

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Communicating with staff about change

I have been attempting to lead staff into a change in thinking about the use of technology in teaching and learning. Below is the content of an email I sent in response to a request for some web links to use with students in the classroom.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it’s a good idea to have access to as much technology as possible in order for you to make useful and appropriate decisions about your student’s learning. This includes the software, apps and web resources you use with your students.

However, how these resources are used is up for discussion. As the picture on the left shows, it’s not merely using the technology that’s important, it’s how it is used to promote thinking. That’s the issue. I should also point out I don’t necessarily agree with the ‘right answer’ ‘wrong answer’ classification but I certainly agree with the conclusion - ‘Technology is a tool, not an learning outcome.’

To help you understand this better I include the SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition) model below. It shows the various levels where technology is used and the thinking it promotes. There is nothing wrong in making pezis or posting to Edmodo at a substitution level but in order to aim at modifying and redefining learning events we need to focus on engaging students at a greater level of inquiry.

For some of us, we are going to do some major thinking around the how, why and what we teach. I know I have. Dan and I have been submerged in a Bastow course ~ Leading Schools in the Digital Age and now we are bringing many of the concepts we have been working through home to Wellington.
Have you had an opportunity to view the examples of student’s portfolios yet? I include them again for your information.  They are not complete. Students need you to prompt them to reflect on their learning and upload some examples of their achievements.

Here are the examples of some students ePortfolios for 8K I have previously posted. I have their permission to distribute their links

Here are some useful links which you may find helpful.

Cartoon strips and animations

Go!Animate Takes storytelling using online cartoon strip makers a little bit further by allowing students to spark life into characters and create short animations. A super tool to foster creativity and engage students.
Xtra Normal For creating text to speech animated movies. A useful tool for social development.
MakeBeliefsComix Encourage writing, reading, and storytelling. With this tool, students can create online comics.
Hot Potato An easy tool that’s free to educators. Build your own crosswords, matching exercises, short answer, multiple-choice, and jumbled sentences. Makes homework prep a breeze.
ToonDoo A web application that allows students to create their own comic strips. Highly motivational, it allows students to express themselves in a more creative way.